I affirm my unwavering adherence to all laws governing human conduct.
I was duly invited to Canada through legitimate channels and never remained on Canadian soil illegally for even a single day.
Throughout my time there, I fulfilled all financial obligations, covering expenses diligently, and demonstrated profound love and commitment to my family at every opportunity, even as they chose to remain behind.
In reflecting upon the principles that should guide civilized society, I invoke the words of,
Peter Kropotkin:
“Competition is the law of the jungle, but cooperation is the law of civilization.”
Institutions and Inaction to investigate, with clear Evidence of reprisal. The systemic bias.
This page contains the complete, unedited correspondence and decisions from my FIPPA appeals to the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario (files PA24-00743, PA25-00568, PA25-00552, PA25-00318 and related). It is published as a permanent public record for transparency and personal safety given the threats I have received. These documents demonstrate the repeated redirection to the University for my own records, misclassification under s. 42, and procedural barriers I encountered.
IPC Official Logo and Opening of the File
This marks the beginning of my FIPPA appeal process with the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario (IPC). The documents that follow show how my requests for my own academic and thesis-related records were handled.
IPC Closing Letter – PA24-00743 (April 10, 2025)
The IPC closed this appeal after the University issued a decision on my clarified request. I had not agreed to the narrowing of my original September 18, 2024 request, which included my thesis evaluation and supervisor correspondence.
Over 7 months to process a simple request never properly done.
University of Windsor Decision & IPC Reconsideration (June 2, 2025 – PA25-00318)
The IPC upheld the closure despite my objections that the University’s response was late, that key records (thesis evaluation, disciplinary notes, supervisor emails) were denied under s. 42 (third-party information), and that I was being redirected back to the University for access to my own documents.
Evidence of Ongoing Barriers – Supervisor Conduct
Records I sought through FIPPA directly relate to complaints I made about unprofessional conduct by my first supervisor. The University and IPC process repeatedly treated these as third-party requests and close the file rather than my personal academic records.
Evidence: Supervisor Weaponizing Complaint to Stall Research
After I raised concerns about supervision, the same supervisor used the complaint process in ways that stalled my academic work. The FIPPA requests were intended to obtain the related records, yet the IPC process required me to restart with the University instead of ordering disclosure.
Intensifying Procedural Requirements
Subsequent appeals (PA25-00552 and PA25-00568) triggered new requests for decision letters, fee payments, and additional information, even though I was seeking my own records.
Unresolved Core Issue
The central problem remained: the IPC consistently directed me back to the University for records that the University itself had already partially denied or delayed under FIPPA.
Started New Appeal Process (PA25-00568)
New appeal opened on the University’s interim fee estimate. I was required to pay 50% of the estimate before any further search would be completed, despite my financial-hardship request.
After Whistleblower Activity
Following my public disclosures and parallel HRTO applications, the procedural hurdles in the FIPPA process increased, including repeated file closures and redirection back to the same institution whose records I was seeking.
Concerns About Perceived Partiality
My complaint to the Canadian Legal Complaints Authority (CLA) regarding perceived partiality in the handling of these matters was closed. The IPC continued to require me to seek my own records directly from the University. The file was closed
Additional note on the closing letter
CLA closed concerns about perceived partiality during the course of processing – simply untrue.’ This highlights my disagreement with the IPC’s handling and perceived impartiality issues. This reflects the University’s and IPC’s repeated position that I must approach individual professors/supervisors directly rather than using FIPPA to obtain official institutional records about my own academic file.
Pattern of Unprofessional Conduct by Multiple Thesis Supervisors
The records I have been seeking through these IPC appeals concern more than one supervisor at the University of Windsor. The systemic redirection and classification issues prevented timely access to evidence needed for my related HRTO applications.
Continuous case closure obstructing justice and my own data that contained evidences in my favour…
DISCLAIMER : The content on this website, including all posts, chapters, and materials, represents the personal experiences, opinions, and views of the author, Danillo Galdo Gaspar, based on events as I perceive them. It is provided for informational and advocacy purposes only and is not intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice, professional counsel, or a definitive statement of fact.
Any allegations of misconduct, discrimination, collusion, or other issues mentioned herein are alleged and have not been adjudicated in a court of law unless explicitly stated otherwise. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own independent research, verify information through official sources, and consult qualified professionals (such as lawyers or authorities) before forming conclusions or taking action.
This site exercises rights to freedom of expression under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and aims to raise awareness about potential systemic issues in higher education and immigration. No malice is intended toward any individuals or institutions named, and the author welcomes factual corrections or dialogue to promote accuracy and resolution.
The author disclaims any liability for errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this content. By accessing this site, you agree to these terms and acknowledge that the information is shared in good faith for public interest discussion.
Stop University of Windsor 