I affirm my unwavering adherence to all laws governing human conduct.
I was duly invited to Canada through legitimate channels and never remained on Canadian soil illegally for even a single day.
Throughout my time there, I fulfilled all financial obligations, covering expenses diligently, and demonstrated profound love and commitment to my family at every opportunity, even as they chose to remain behind.
In reflecting upon the principles that should guide civilized society, I invoke the words of,
Peter Kropotkin:
“Competition is the law of the jungle, but cooperation is the law of civilization.”
Institutions and Inaction to investigate, with clear Evidence of reprisal. The systemic bias.
This page contains the complete, unedited correspondence and decisions from the Inspector General of Policing (IoP) regarding complaints filed against the Windsor Police Service (files 25-312 and 25-703). These documents address the IoP’s jurisdictional limitations in relation to police conduct investigations, the formal referral of one complaint to the Law Enforcement Complaints Agency (LECA), and the subsequent refusal to investigate a second complaint on public interest grounds. The materials further illustrate the procedural barriers encountered by the complainant, including the IoP’s reliance on the Community Safety and Policing Act, 2019 (CSPA) to decline jurisdiction over university-related disputes, Crown charge reviews, and international reporting circumstances.
IOP Official Decision Letter – Referral to LECA (File 25-312, September 25, 2025)
This document constitutes the Inspector General of Policing’s formal response to a complaint submitted regarding an arrest that occurred in January 2025 on charges of assault and uttering threats. The complainant raised concerns that the police had failed to verify the victim’s injuries, neglected to consider the victim’s motives, conducted a biased investigation, and caused family harm by restricting access to the complainant’s child. The complainant further alleged that the arrest resulted in a withdrawal from university and sought a fraud investigation into alleged reprisals by the university. Upon review, the IoP determined that its statutory mandate did not extend to requesting Crown reviews of criminal charges, addressing trauma related to Hague proceedings, or adjudicating university-related misconduct, which were matters better suited for the criminal courts, internal university processes, or civil litigation. With respect to the allegations concerning the quality of the police investigation, the IoP concluded that these fell outside its jurisdiction because they directly pertained to officer conduct. Consequently, the IoP exercised its authority to forward the complaint to the Law Enforcement Complaints Agency (LECA), identifying it as the most appropriate body to handle the conduct concerns. The decision was declared final, not subject to appeal, and the file was officially closed.
IOP Closing Decision Letter – Refusal to Investigate on Public Interest Grounds (File 25-703, November 7, 2025)
This document represents the Inspector General of Policing’s disposition of a subsequent complaint submitted in September 2025, which specifically contested a previous dismissal decision made by the Law Enforcement Complaints Agency (LECA). The complainant alleged that the Windsor Police Service had engaged in discriminatory conduct by refusing to accept a report of a threat over the telephone and instead requiring an in-person attendance, a requirement deemed unreasonable given that the complainant was residing in Brazil. The complainant further asserted that the departure to Brazil was necessitated by an imminent threat of illegal arrest and criminal actions by the police service. The IoP declined to investigate the matter pursuant to section 107(2)(b) of the Community Safety and Policing Act, 2019, having formed the opinion that proceeding with the complaint was not in the public interest. This determination was supported by several considerations: the IoP lacked jurisdiction and authority over LECA’s independent determinations; requiring in-person reporting constituted a standard and reasonable operational decision by the police service; and the complainant’s own acknowledgment of leaving Canada to avoid potential arrest suggested an intent to obstruct justice. Furthermore, the IoP deemed it a reasonable operational decision for the police to decline investigating an alleged threat received via email when the complainant resided outside the country. The file was permanently closed without any right of appeal.
DISCLAIMER : The content on this website, including all posts, chapters, and materials, represents the personal experiences, opinions, and views of the author, Danillo Galdo Gaspar, based on events as I perceive them. It is provided for informational and advocacy purposes only and is not intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice, professional counsel, or a definitive statement of fact.
Any allegations of misconduct, discrimination, collusion, or other issues mentioned herein are alleged and have not been adjudicated in a court of law unless explicitly stated otherwise. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own independent research, verify information through official sources, and consult qualified professionals (such as lawyers or authorities) before forming conclusions or taking action.
This site exercises rights to freedom of expression under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and aims to raise awareness about potential systemic issues in higher education and immigration. No malice is intended toward any individuals or institutions named, and the author welcomes factual corrections or dialogue to promote accuracy and resolution.
The author disclaims any liability for errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this content. By accessing this site, you agree to these terms and acknowledge that the information is shared in good faith for public interest discussion.
Stop University of Windsor 