I affirm my unwavering adherence to all laws governing human conduct.
I was duly invited to Canada through legitimate channels and never remained on Canadian soil illegally for even a single day.
Throughout my time there, I fulfilled all financial obligations, covering expenses diligently, and demonstrated profound love and commitment to my family at every opportunity, even as they chose to remain behind.
In reflecting upon the principles that should guide civilized society, I invoke the words of,
Peter Kropotkin:
“Competition is the law of the jungle, but cooperation is the law of civilization.”
Institutions and Inaction to investigate, with clear Evidence of reprisal. The systemic bias.
This page contains the complete, unedited correspondence and decisions from my complaints and appeals to the Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the RCMP (CRCC) (files R2025-007924, R2025-4567 and related). It is published as a permanent public record for transparency and personal safety given the threats I have received. These documents demonstrate the repeated jurisdictional dismissal of my complaints against the Windsor Police Service, the imposition of communication restrictions for “unreasonable behaviour,” the extension of those restrictions for alleged circumvention, and the procedural barriers I encountered when attempting to file complaints regarding RCMP misconduct.
RCMP Official Logo and Opening of the File
This document serves as the formal substantive response to the original complaint filed in September 2025, and it results in the permanent closure of that file. The CRCC clarifies its statutory mandate, emphasizing that its jurisdiction is strictly confined to investigating allegations of improper conduct by RCMP Regular Members, Civilian Members, and specific appointees under the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act. The Commission explicitly distinguishes itself as a separate federal oversight body from the RCMP itself and underscores that it does not conduct criminal investigations. Since the complaint was directed against members of the Windsor Police Service, the CRCC determined that the matter fell entirely outside its legal purview and redirected the complainant to the proper provincial oversight authority, the Law Enforcement Complaints Agency (LECA). Regarding any grievances against University of Windsor staff, the Commission advised that criminal allegations must be directed to the local police service, while non-criminal issues required handling through the university’s internal complaint processes. The file was accordingly closed, and the letter concludes by noting that no further appeal mechanism exists under the RCMP Act for that decision, suggesting that independent legal advice may be sought for any alternative recourse.
RCPM Restraining communication Letter – R2025-007924 (June 2, 2026)
This document represents the CRCC’s extension of the existing communication restrictions by an additional full year, moving the expiry date to May 14, 2027. The extension is justified by the Commission’s documentation of the complainant’s alleged failure to comply with the initial order. Specifically, the record indicates that on the very day the November 2025 letter was received, the individual submitted an online complaint form in direct violation of the restriction. Additionally, a secondary email address appeared to have been created shortly thereafter, which the Commission interpreted as an attempt to circumvent the ban. The Commission further notes that between November 2025 and May 2026, over forty-seven emails were received contrary to the imposed restrictions, including copies sent to multiple other agencies. As a result, the CRCC formally extended the postal-mail-only requirement and reiterated that any future correspondence sent in violation of these instructions would be discarded without being reviewed, actioned, or retained.
RCPM Restraining communication Letter – R2025-007924 (November 14, 2025)
This document constitutes the CRCC’s first formal directive imposing a six-month postal-mail-only restriction on the complainant. It outlines the chronology of prior interactions, beginning with a complaint filed in September 2025 against the Windsor Police Service—a matter the Commission had already declined to accept on jurisdictional grounds. The record shows that subsequent warnings were issued in October 2025, instructing the individual to cease copying the Commission on emails that were not specifically directed to it. Despite these explicit cautions, the complainant continued to send additional irrelevant emails for which the Commission was merely a copied recipient. Consequently, the CRCC invoked its “Policy on Unreasonable Complainant Behaviour” and restricted all future contact to postal mail for a period of six months, lasting until May 14, 2026. The letter allows for the submission of new complaints regarding RCMP member misconduct exclusively via that postal channel, while strictly prohibiting any other form of communication during that interval.
2 messages
Complaints-CRCC complaints@crcc-ccetp.gc.ca Thu, Sep 25, 2025 at 4:36 PM
To: “maildodanillo@gmail.com” maildodanillo@gmail.com
Good afternoon Danillo Gaspar. The Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the RCMP acknowledges receipt of your on-line
submission to our Commission in which you stated the following:
RCMP:
“PC Domenic Stramacchia (WPS Officer): Refused assault investigation (Apr 15, 2025) due to my Brazil location, imposing barriers (email
evidence attached). Involvement: Discriminatory denial of service.
Officer Jane White (WPS, jwhite@windsorpolice.ca): Dismissed inquiries unprofessionally (Apr 23, 2025), no follow-up on breach reports.
Involvement: Obstruction of justice.
Staff Sergeant Paterson (WPS, mpaterson@windsorpolice.ca): Ignored assault report (Mar 3, 2025) with video evidence; advised calling
dispatch from Brazil (impossible). Involvement: Failure to investigate.
Dr. Colin Novak (U of Windsor Supervisor): Academic sabotage, false falsification claim (May 2024), coerced wife’s false accusation.
Involvement: Retaliation leading to arrest.
Richard Taylor (U of Windsor FOI Coordinator): Obstructed FIPPA (#3837, 105-day delay); fraud reports rejected. Involvement: Data occlusion
aiding alienation.
Unnamed WPS Officers (Threat Report, Aug 6, 2025): Refused to file violence threat from “LiarFinder@uwindsor.ca“. Involvement: Noninvestigation
of harassment.
Attorney General Officials (Unnamed): Issued arrest warrant (notified Jun 2025) without proof, denying motions for pathologist/medical review.
Involvement: Abuse of power in criminal case (0811998258110022500).
DETAILS:
Dear Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) Complaints and Investigations Unit,
I am filing a formal complaint regarding systemic misconduct, discrimination, and obstruction of justice by the Windsor Police Service (WPS),
University of Windsor, and related parties, involving potential federal offenses under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA), Criminal
Code, and the Hague Convention on Child Abduction. This has led to my wrongful arrest on January 12, 2025, over 255 days of parental
alienation from my son, Isaac
Background (Jan 2022 – Jan 2025):
Arrived in Canada on January 5, 2022, on a student visa (UCI: 92437966) with my wife, Noemi Ferreira Gaspar (UCI: 1118907081), on a
dependent permit. Pursued a Master’s in Mechatronics, achieving a 7.8 GPA, but faced academic sabotage from supervisors Dr. Colin Novak
and Dr. Eunsik Kim, including false data claims (May 2024) and denied appeals under Senate Bylaw 55.
False Assault Claim and Alienation (Jan 2025):
On January 11, 2025, Noemi assaulted me at 3551 Rockwell Blvd, Windsor, ON (video: https://drive.google.com/file/d/
1aL8EIbPDTXIuwa9KR1olkS8ITmFqU2Ma/view?usp=drive_link), yet I believe the University coerced her into a false assault claim (WPS Case
ID: 113228), leading to my arrest and a restraining order on January 12, 2025. Visa expiry (Jan 30, 2025) forced my departure to Brazil, while
Noemi stayed illegally (IRPA s. 41; CBSA Tip BL1740827725594), causing 255+ days of alienation as of September 24, 2025.
Police Misconduct (Jan – Sep 2025):
Assault Report (Mar 3, 2025): No investigation despite evidence to mpaterson@windsorpolice.ca and jwhite@windsorpolice.ca.
Breach Report (Mar 27, 2025): Noemi’s contact cessation ignored.
Fraud Reports: T240098856 (Dec 16, 2024), T25001116 (Feb 7, 2025), T25006255/T25006257 (Jul 21, 2025) rejected as “civil matters.”
Discriminatory Conduct: PC Stramacchia (Apr 15, 2025) and Officer White (Apr 23, 2025) refused action due to my Brazil location.
Threat Report (Aug 6, 2025): Denied; OIPRD 25-313 closed without notice.
LECA/OIPRD Failures:
LECA E-202507222159517905 (Jul 22, 2025): Closed Sep 19, 2025, as “not in public interest” without investigation, citing criminal charges,
lacking reasoning.
OIPRD 25-313 (Apr 29, 2025): Closed without notification.
Judicial Obstructions:
Criminal Case (0811998258110022500): Motions for medical/pathologist reports denied without justification.
Custody Case (FS-25-00025167-0000): Filed Mar 7, 2025; court ignored alienation and denied psychiatric evaluation requests (e.g., Sep 17,
2025 motion).
University and Attorney General Involvement:
University obstructs FIPPA (#3837) and employs Noemi without status. Attorney General’s arrest warrant (notified Jun 2025) without proof
suggests data occlusion and power abuse against an immigrant denied Legal Aid.
Allegations
Misconduct: WPS failed to act, imposing discriminatory barriers.
Obstruction: Denials hinder my defense and custody case.
Federal Offenses: Noemi’s overstay and fraud involve IRPA and abduction.
Collusion: University and Attorney General may coordinate to oppress me.
Request
Investigate federal offenses (IRPA fraud, Criminal Code obstruction).
Review misconduct by police, university, and prosecution.
Enforce immigration laws and expedite Isaac’s return.
Sincerely,
DISCLAIMER : The content on this website, including all posts, chapters, and materials, represents the personal experiences, opinions, and views of the author, Danillo Galdo Gaspar, based on events as I perceive them. It is provided for informational and advocacy purposes only and is not intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice, professional counsel, or a definitive statement of fact.
Any allegations of misconduct, discrimination, collusion, or other issues mentioned herein are alleged and have not been adjudicated in a court of law unless explicitly stated otherwise. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own independent research, verify information through official sources, and consult qualified professionals (such as lawyers or authorities) before forming conclusions or taking action.
This site exercises rights to freedom of expression under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and aims to raise awareness about potential systemic issues in higher education and immigration. No malice is intended toward any individuals or institutions named, and the author welcomes factual corrections or dialogue to promote accuracy and resolution.
The author disclaims any liability for errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this content. By accessing this site, you agree to these terms and acknowledge that the information is shared in good faith for public interest discussion.
Stop University of Windsor 